Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Of mice and men (Three Blind Mice)


(photo by Fiora Sacco, Sydney Film Festival)

Sydney Film Festival -
Three Blind Mice (Matthew Newton, Australia, 2008)


It seems everyone I spoke to before the screening wanted to hate this film, and everyone I spoke to after the screening admitted to liking it, but with surprising reluctance. I had high expectations for this new Australian film, which had its world premiere in competition just days (some say hours) after the final cut was completed, and Three Blind Mice more than exceeded them. It's a confident and extremely promising debut for writer-director Matthew Newton and a treasure trove of local talent, both fresh and firmly established.

Apart from seeing him on stage in Tom Stoppard's excellent Rock 'n Roll, I'm not overly familiar with actor Matthew Newton's work, nor that of his friends and colleagues. Perhaps if I were from around here I'd understand better why so many seemed to want them to fail (perhaps someone can enlighten me in the comments?). Many Australians seem to have a love-hate relationship with success. Is it that local audiences find it hard to recompense the work of clever, over-privileged white boys from the Eastern Suburbs? Rumour has it that amongst the five jury members, it was the three foreigners who pushed for the film to be awarded a special mention...

I found this tightly scripted semi-improvisational drama to be engrossing and ultimately quite moving. Clearly inspired by John Cassavettes (by way perhaps of Andrew Bujalski?), the film takes an old fashioned premise - three marines hitting the town for one last night before being shipped off to war - and makes it feel fresh and authentic thanks to vibrant, off-the-cuff dialogue and excitingly raw performances.

Unfolding over the course of one emotional night, the film follows three Royal Australian Navy soldiers as they attempt to get laid, bid goodbye to their city and make some sense of their life before it is put at risk in the Gulf.

Matthew Newton, Ewen Leslie and Toby Schmitz are excellent as the three buddies, allowing their characters - the party animal, the sensitive guy and the dark horse - to come of age over only a few hours without asking the audience to suspend disbelief. They are served by superbly written set pieces which come alive with the unadulterated spontaneity of authentic-sounding dialogue.

These exchanges, which occasionally overlap, randomly explode in blisteringly funny moments of dark comedy. Newton tackles some difficult personal issues with the lightest of touches. In this respect, he adopts a resolutely Australian tone, never too careful in his insistence not to take things too seriously.

Australian journalist and festival programmer Shane Danielsen had this to say about local competition entries Three Blind Mice and The Square:
"Though markedly dissimilar in style, what these two films shared was a fascination, bordering almost upon the forensic, with what it meant to be a man, and to live and act in a male-dominated world (...). For some of us, though, they offered hope that, after more than a decade in which Australian cinema - at least in its international manifestations - became synonymous with camp, caricature and superficiality, there was a willingness on the part of filmmakers to once again engage with something resembling real life, and to address actual human emotions. With nary a sequin or red velvet curtain in sight."
Beyond this statement's dubious undertones, I disagree with the implication that the unmentioned films alluded to here, in all their camp, sequined superficiality, weren't also addressing notions of Australian masculinity, and engaging, under cover of spectacle, with the "actual human emotions" of this so-called "real life".

Three Blind Mice wouldn't know what to do with a velvet curtain, concerned as it is with the unadorned immediacy of the here and now. It's a film about men coming to terms with their masculinity, sure, but first and foremost it's a film about boys trying to find out what kind of decisions they want to be making as adults.

In any case there's no disputing that the male protagonists of Three Blind Mice are recognizably Australian, and not very different from the blokes you and I may know and hang out with down the pub. Newton has given his characters depth without giving up their boy-next-door authenticity, and he's given them complexity without compromising on their blokey nature.

We should be thankful for the energy and talent of Matthew Newton and his friends. A trip on the international festival circuit, where this kind of cinema is often taken a little more seriously than by Sydney's cultural commentators, might wipe that smug smile off their face, but in the meantime they should be celebrating. This is the kind of Australian cinema we should get excited about.

Three Blind Mice is currently without Australian distribution.

7 comments:

Glenn said...

Am I the only one who thinks that Danielsen quote is absurdly homophobic and mysoginistic. Like, well - those gays and the women have had their fun, now let's get back to movies about true blue aussie heterosexual blokes. That's what real cinema is all about.

Ugh.

Matt Riviera said...

Nope Glenn, you're not the only one. I hope.

It's especially irksome because it seems pretty far from the filmmakers' intentions.

Ugh indeed.

Paul Martin said...

Many seemed to want them to fail

You know that Matthew Newton is the son of the iconic Bert? Recent indiscretions by the younger Newton landed him in court (I don't remember the charges). Maybe he's perceived as born into privelege and is spoilt. Maybe it's tall-poppy syndrome (though I rather think that is overstated in this country). I don't know, I'm just surmising.

Kamikaze Camel said...

Paul, Newton was charged with battery against his ex girlfriend (fiance?) Brooke Satchwell. I personally think that unease about Newton is what kept him from getting an AFI nod last year for The Bet. An average movie for sure, but in such a weak field Newton was quite deserving.

Shane Danielsen said...

Actually, it's not the latent or overt homosexuality of those "unnamed" Australian films I find boring – though heaven knows, defining oneself by one's sexuality (and, by extension, living in Sydney) must rank as one of the dullest ways to choose to live one's life.

And for the record, I'm no homophobe: golly, some of my best friends are gay, etc. (And women!) In fact, I was called a poof for most of my adolescence, just for doing such unmanly things as reading and watching movies and, weirdly, talking to girls. But that's Australia for you.

Nor am I adverse to gay cinema per se - though I do think it gets an easier ride, in the festival world at least, than any other kind of film. (if it is gay, and it exists, it is perforce good - and an entire network of gay-themed, essentially uncurated festivals exists to support this contention.)

What I AM adverse to, and very much so, is bad filmmaking, shoddy storytelling. And specifically, films that substitute caricature for characterisation, spectacle for narrative complexity. Whether gay or straight or bi, male or female or trans-gendered, I tend to like my stories to be populated by people I care about, am engaged with and intriuged by. Not a bunch of shrill, shrieking cartoons. And that's what most of those Priscilla/Baz films did.

Oddly, many of my gay friends feel the same way. They're not happy to see their complexity reduced to one-note faggotry; nor would I be, in their place.

If I'm pleased by the Newton and Edgerton films, it's partly because they represent a re-emergence of diversity in Australian filmmaking, rather than a single defining style. This being the point of my original piece, which in your righteous outrage, you appear to have missed.

Oh, and finally, just to satisfy you two watchdogs of political correctness, some of my favourite working filmmakers: Claire Denis (chick), Lucrecia Martel (ditto), Gus Van Sant (gay), Hou Hsiao-hsien (Asian), Apichatpong Weerasethakul (hmm, Asian AND gay: a twofer), Mahamat-Saleh Haroun (coloured bloke) ... That sufficiently commited to diversity for you?

Anonymous said...

Many seemed to want them to fail

--------------------

It's jealousy, Matt.

Though in Oz we make it sound fancier by calling it "tall poppy syndrome".

But it's really plain old common garden and in French, "la jealousie".

Paul Martin said...

I've just seen Three Blind Mice at the AFI Member Screenings, and can now see why you were so excited by this film, Matt. I couldn't remember where I'd seen the Cassavetes reference. I was about 2/3 through the film when I saw the common aesthetic/style and it enhanced the experience markedly.

The film is very fresh, very current, very real. I was impressed by the sheer volume of credible support actors who only had small roles. This Newton fellow is definitely a talent to watch. I hope you're having some fun (and not too overloaded) in Toronto, you lucky bastard.