tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20322754.post6853299833894246247..comments2008-12-19T16:34:32.660+11:00Matt Rivierahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03856241078630118517noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20322754.post-54933427869671253632008-12-19T16:34:00.000+11:002008-12-19T16:34:00.000+11:00You're right. I have to be more careful about spoilers. It's not something I think about. I guess I don't mind them myself - what happens is not what drives me to see / like a movie. (Plus in this case I think you read between the lines).<BR/><BR/>As for the federal shield law I don't think that's what Lurie is pushing for. The film seems to indicate that the identity of the source is what drives Rachel to remain quiet as long as she does, not the actual principle.Matt Rivierahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03856241078630118517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20322754.post-31788507551532267272008-12-16T17:59:00.000+11:002008-12-16T17:59:00.000+11:00Boy, you certainly have some spoilers - which is not very cool, Matt. You talk about the most interesting character dying and then say who that most interesting character is.<BR/><BR/>It also seems odd to call this a liberal film when the call for a federal shield law is mostly a Republican issue.<BR/><BR/>I'm seeing it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com